-=-
Menu
Tournaments
Profile
Poll
Latest videos
Latest comments
2019-09-16: "CDF in, vetoes ..." -Laro24
2019-09-15: "GG lads ..." -GrytmasternCC
2019-09-15: "-t3> in." -Vivando
2019-09-15: "no scam" -Vivando
2019-09-15: "After a dozens ..." -Krzysiek
2019-09-15: "Postponed to a ..." -Vivando
2019-09-13: " ..." -Vivando
2019-09-13: "I should be abl..." -Loon
2019-09-09: "weirdchamp ..." -ThunDer
2019-09-08: " ..." -batata
2019-09-08: "GG guys ..." -GrytmasternCC
2019-09-07: "hm, i should sa..." -Loon
Latest matches
flag -t3> [13:05] [GpW]flag
flag CX [17:18] -t3>flag
flag [CDF] [13:10] CCflag
flag [GpW] [05:03] [CDF]flag
flag CX [13:03] [CDF]flag
flag CX [08:07] [CDF]flag
flag [GpW] [09:03] [CDF]flag
flag [GpW] [13:00] [CDF]flag
flag [CDF] [05:04] CXflag
flag CX [14:01] [CDF]flag
Latest forum posts
By: Toni, in: What JJ2 level title best describes your sex life?JJ2 related 2019-09-08 01:11
Underrated Paradise
By: DanZeal, in: Funniest moments!Forum games 2019-09-07 20:02
[20:00:05] DannyZ[CDF]: Jag var i Finland tidigare...
By: SirEmentaler, in: What JJ2 level title best describes your sex life?JJ2 related 2019-08-21 20:45
I just wanted to say this topic was inspired by a ...
By: Slaz, in: What JJ2 level title best describes your sex life?JJ2 related 2019-08-20 14:13
ELEKTREK PYRAMID :dizzy:
By: PurpleJazz, in: What JJ2 level title best describes your sex life?JJ2 related 2019-08-19 06:44
15 Second Rush
More...!

JJnet's forum

«Latest posts» «Latest threads» «Search» «User CP»

     Kick/ban list | [q] 2011-07-14 12:41
Lithium
aEsavatar
JJnet user

Posts: 1758
107
Post your kick/ban list suggestions here.

So far we got a few:

No bans unless someone is cheating or keeps insulting. A kick would do. -TW's idea.
Kicks and bans for personal reasons are not allowed.

Suggest more or try improving the existing ones.


We rode on the winds of the rising storm,
We ran to the sounds of the thunder.
We danced among the lightning bolts,
and tore the world asunder.
Replies
Grytolle
avatar

JJnet admin
Posts: 847
87
#1 | [q]2011-07-14 12:47
Quote:
Kicks and bans for personal reasons are not allowed.

Better might be something like:
Valid kick (and ban) reasons are limited to disturbing behaviour (which will need more extensive discussion), command abuse and cheating (which is a special case to be discussed for ZR).

"Personal reasons" isn't a workable term, because it is definitely OK to kick a player off who you personally dislike whenever he misbehaves

Bans should be used if a kick didn't do the trick, and admins should use a short timelimit (an hour or something, depending on the purpose of the ban) in most instances
Lithium
aEs
avatar
JJnet user
Posts: 1758
107
#2 | [q]2011-07-14 12:50
Quote:
Bans should be used if a kick didn't do the trick, and admins should use a short timelimit (an hour or something, depending on the purpose of the ban) in most instances


Yes. Instead of banning a player for one day and then unbanning him 20 minutes later,a 20 minute ban should be used


We rode on the winds of the rising storm,
We ran to the sounds of the thunder.
We danced among the lightning bolts,
and tore the world asunder.
KiMO
avatar

JJnet user
Posts: 276
14
#3 | [q]2011-07-14 13:24
also, a BAN for 3 days is enough for someone who's been faking. emo
Lithium
aEs
avatar
JJnet user
Posts: 1758
107
#4 | [q]2011-07-14 14:04
Alright so we should add this:
Use ban only if kick did not help.
If an admin has to ban a certain player for a short amount of time,he should use the exact time instead of banning for a day or more.








We rode on the winds of the rising storm,
We ran to the sounds of the thunder.
We danced among the lightning bolts,
and tore the world asunder.
Grytolle
avatar

JJnet admin
Posts: 847
87
#5 | [q]2011-07-14 15:09
Yes, in most cases a short ban would suffice. Longer bans should be reserved for repeated offenders (which have then been discussed under the ZD trustees anyway), which could be kept in a list.

We were planning to make some kind of "crime register" back when SR was doing bad stuff all the time (both for ZD and for JJnet), but the matter became a lot less urgent somehow :p
cooba
[si]
avatar
JJnet user
Posts: 323
51
#6 | [q]2011-07-14 20:30
Quote:
it is definitely OK to kick a player off who you personally dislike whenever he misbehaves

Um, what? Absolutely not.


Jazz 2 Online
http://www.jazz2online.com
[GpW]Urbs
[GpW]
avatar
JJnet user
Posts: 377
54
#7 | [q]2011-07-14 20:38
I think Gry meant that you shouldn't hold back when somebody who falls under both of these 2 categories:
a) he misbehaves, being the only valid criterion for a bann/kick
b) you hate him for some reason. Not being a kickworthy criterion by itself, but should also not be a criterion stopping you from a kick.

You know how teachers like some pupils more than others? And they are conscious of this fact. Then sometimes, because they know they're biased, they might try to rectify this by actually being nicer to the kid they don't like as much, so it wouldn't seem like they're biased and so that all the kids get the same treatment. Sometimes what happens is that the kidd might actually end up getting preferential treatment.

Imagine being faced with SR in a server. Imagine you dislike him. You might not kick him the moment he deserves it just to not start a big fight or something.

But if you were to go by the rules, you shoudln't hesitate, is what Gry is saying I think. Or what I understand under what he says anywayemo

If I'm wrong, then Cooba's response is correctemo
TheRock
avatar

JJnet user
Posts: 7
4
#8 | [q]2011-07-14 21:12
Imagine that you deserve to being banned urbs
Lithium
aEs
avatar
JJnet user
Posts: 1758
107
#9 | [q]2011-07-14 21:21
Hi SR!


We rode on the winds of the rising storm,
We ran to the sounds of the thunder.
We danced among the lightning bolts,
and tore the world asunder.
[GpW]Urbs
[GpW]
avatar
JJnet user
Posts: 377
54
#10 | [q]2011-07-14 22:23
Sorry SR, but ur the superstar so I used your nameemo
Grytolle
avatar

JJnet admin
Posts: 847
87
#11 | [q]2011-07-14 22:53
Quote:
I think Gry meant that you shouldn't hold back when somebody who falls under both of these 2 categories:
a) he misbehaves, being the only valid criterion for a bann/kick
b) you hate him for some reason. Not being a kickworthy criterion by itself, but should also not be a criterion stopping you from a kick.

You know how teachers like some pupils more than others? And they are conscious of this fact. Then sometimes, because they know they're biased, they might try to rectify this by actually being nicer to the kid they don't like as much, so it wouldn't seem like they're biased and so that all the kids get the same treatment. Sometimes what happens is that the kidd might actually end up getting preferential treatment.

Imagine being faced with SR in a server. Imagine you dislike him. You might not kick him the moment he deserves it just to not start a big fight or something.

But if you were to go by the rules, you shoudln't hesitate, is what Gry is saying I think. Or what I understand under what he says anywayemo

If I'm wrong, then Cooba's response is correctemo

That's what I meant. emo