-=-
Menu
Tournaments
Profile
Poll
Latest videos
Latest comments
2019-03-26: "Done. ..." -Vivando
2019-03-26: "close game jell..." -Ragnarok
2019-03-26: "The bblair subm..." -Jelly Jam
2019-03-26: "psl add other m..." -GrytmasternCC
2019-03-24: "http://jazzjack..." -Krzysiek
2019-03-23: "http://i65.tiny..." -BlAcKeYe
2019-03-22: "but friendship ..." -Ragnarok
2019-03-21: "that was an emo..." -Ragnarok
2019-03-19: "Nothing has bee..." -Grytolle
2019-03-18: "yo sj, change f..." -ThunDer
2019-03-17: "Considering it ..." -Vegito
2019-03-17: "It was a test ..." -MasterSven
Latest matches
flag [GpW] [08:07] [CDF]flag
flag [GpW] [10:04] [CDF]flag
flag CX [15:02] -t3>flag
flag CX [15:02] [GpW]flag
flag CX [10:07] -t3>flag
flag CX [10:08] [GpW]flag
flag [GpW] [06:02] CXflag
flag CX [05:03] [GpW]flag
flag CX [09:03] [CDF]flag
flag CX [13:02] [CDF]flag
Latest forum posts
By: Ragnarok, in: A new balance proposalImproving rules 2019-03-27 00:00
Superjazz - could JJnet consider enabling this for...
By: Treylina, in: A new balance proposalImproving rules 2019-03-21 01:01
I don't normally double post so soon, but there's ...
By: Treylina, in: A new balance proposalImproving rules 2019-03-20 23:10
Judging by feedback in-game, the changes are good ...
By: Vegito, in: A new balance proposalImproving rules 2019-03-19 23:00
I, as you said, didn't try the changes but watchin...
By: Ragnarok, in: A new balance proposalImproving rules 2019-03-19 20:49
If anything I'm in full support of it then. Wo...
More...!

JJnet's forum

«Latest posts» «Latest threads» «Search» «User CP»

     JJ1 uses the gun from Math Blaster | [q] 2015-05-26 10:33
KRSplatinumavatar
JJnet user

Posts: 256
14
It's true.
Replies
MasterSven
[CDF]
avatar
JJnet user
Posts: 397
41
#1 | [q]2015-05-26 17:23
Splat, whats your theory on why Rag hasn't announced anything about the 2on2 tournament knockout stage yet?
Ragnarok
CX
avatar
JJnet user
Posts: 124
21
#2 | [q]2015-05-26 17:55
I'll paypal him some money if he gets it right!
KRSplatinum
avatar

JJnet user
Posts: 256
14
#3 | [q]2015-05-26 17:59
I guess that group stage isn't over yet, since groups are of 4 teams, and every team hasn't played 3 matches according to the spreadsheet.
Ragnarok
CX
avatar
JJnet user
Posts: 124
21
#4 | [q]2015-05-27 03:52
So close!!
KRSplatinum
avatar

JJnet user
Posts: 256
14
#5 | [q]2015-05-28 23:23
IMO, teams that played all 4 games should automatically advance to knockout stage. Actually groups had 5 teams, I was incorrect about 4 teams. 4SpR and PR played all 4 games. 4SpR went 4-0; PR went 1-3. C2 and L played 3 games, going 2-1 W/L. They should also advance. Therefore a 4-team bracket can be made with 4SpR, PR, C2 and L. Missing games should be regarded as a forfeit, although groups became uneven as some teams were disqualified: without counting wins to determine seeding, I would rely on counting at least how many games they actually played. Having fewer losses and fewer games played doesn't give a team an edge to enter a 4-team bracket. I would suggest a semi-final of (1) 4SpR vs (4) PR and (2) C2 vs (3) L, if there is a knockout stage.