ib) picked Gauntlet RDS picked dw Tiebreaker was Galactic Warfare
UPDATE: ib) has forfeit the match and thus lost the 3rd place and award of the season due to cheating with spectator-voicecom information during round 1 of the game.
Whatever the cheating in round 1 was, it doesn't change the fact we still played horrible and have quite some work to do as CC if we wish to win anything important in the future. It's not like we deserve/deserved a win. ib played legit (I guess) in round 2 and 3 and we still couldn't win cause they were prepared better than us simply. Better trained.
OK, I guess we shouldn't have told the police about our clanmate Anakin... :/
Edit: Or to say it in a nicer way, two things need to be remembered:
1) It just as much constitutes a betrayal against Lahm for his clanmate Sliver (and also for SR and Robee if it was planned before the game started) to start cheating (Lahm says he wasn't in on the plan, but didn't stop it once it started either).
2) A person (such as Lahm!) has more than one loyalty. Listing the relevant ones: Loyalty to IRL friends that play JJ2 if he has any, loyalty to all his separate JJ2 friends, loyalty to his clan (which btw was funded as SR's attempt to "do things right this time" ), loyalty to his clanmates (not necessarily the same thing: one could even make the case that he was in fact being loyal to his non-cheating clanmates by blowing the whistle on this secret), loyalty to his Romanian team (a teammate of his played on RDS's side in that round), loyalty to the people on one of his favourite game, loyalty to the concept for fair play, ... So why would loyalty to those three people who have done the least to deserve it rank the highest?
If you wanna trash Lahm for not putting his foot down at once when the cheating started or for the bad judgment of joining that clan in the first place, be my guest though.
(and if you think I'm full of ****, ask Urbs if I ever gave him attitude for telling on CC playing as LB in jj2wc2) (edit 2: this isn't a reply to owen personally, but to everyone making statements similar to his on jj2)
It's a joke mimicking the so called "experts" and pundits from real TV news and sports shows, the joke being that more often than not they don't deserve to be classified as experts. In sports it's usually ex-athletes, which tends to make at least some sense (same as here, where you have people who have played the game a lot, so they make sense at least some of the time).
But in general, if you look at all the different experts on 24/7 news stations, you'll see that for every hobby there supposedly exist a panel of "experts" (here the hobby being jj2)).
The "funny" part that should worry people is how bad these so called experts are called in for what we perceive as serious topics (economics, politics even science), because obviously news organisations will prefer loud mouths (such as myself) as opposed to dull people who actually know what the hell is going on.
No, but seriously, experts are just commentators. We could have named them commentators, but that wouldn't have been "funny"
What's the deal with these 'experts'? They seemed to be present during most recent CWs and finals, but there's nothing about them in the rules. Neither their task nor whether they have to be present during matches seems to be documented anywhere.
Neither of both teams had more than 2 points of advantage during game, that shows how close the match was. Our teamplay was surprisingly good indeed, I could rely on every our player.
Btw, here's the best summary of our preparation Xd -> [20:02:17] [ib)SlaYer]: cj what should we pick
Well, seems like trying to play in Poland without any training at all vs a team with good teamplay didn't quite work out. Too laggy but above all we were simply outplayed cause we didn't play together in 6 months if not more and they did train quite a bit . The lag was annoying but not as annoying that it would justify us losing. With proper training we could've won GW, but same goes for if we played with the real warteams in the other 2 rounds I guess. Still, this was fun and the playoffs were worth trying something new.
verry nice match i am happy i played gauntlet with those 2 big pwners,it was verry funny and exciteing about the other 2 rounds,i was just so nervous watching them cuz the score was always so close.u showed us some rlly nice matches,i can say! gz ib and gj all! gg
haha guys, awesome match. There were some problems with tiebreak, at the end it was map which i wanted to play at the beggining Great teamplay, gj ib! PRESSING *****!
Good job, iB! You kept up nicely strengthwise and your teamplay was far superior. I hope we will get a chance to take revenge eventually, but until then, enjoy your well-deserved win.
So long intense, heltic clanwar, the best in ib) history. We played great and stable in both first rounds, in GW we had great teamplay (Changing ourselfs with defending C/being R3/And hurting enemy flagger) Our tactic worked very fine there, I told Robee and Sliver after score one is hurting enemy one keeps being R3. I like my kill of Faw (coming around them in our base and kill with toaster pu) when the score was 5-5 in GW and Sliver scored with 1 heart. After that someone of them captured with 1 or 2 and Robee scored the last one. Anyway big thanks for CC for taking us serious, all warteam members showed up and thanks for that, otherwise if someone weaker could play then win wouldnt taste the same like now. Thanks for Lahm for playing really stable in Gauntlet, I trusted you and you didn't disappoint me. Robee was stable and very sure player as usual, but Sliver finally was listen to me and He was always R and S when We wanted him to be. Ty for playing and for watching all.
Inglorious Bastards
Vivando
. The lag was annoying but not as annoying that it would justify us losing. With proper training we could've won GW, but same goes for if we played with the real warteams in the other 2 rounds I guess. Still, this was fun and the playoffs were worth trying something new.
