-=-
Menu
Tournaments
Profile
Poll
Latest videos
Latest comments
2019-03-19: "Nothing has bee..." -Grytolle
2019-03-18: "yo sj, change f..." -ThunDer
2019-03-17: "Considering it ..." -Vegito
2019-03-17: "It was a test ..." -MasterSven
2019-03-17: " and ty for ac..." -Vivando
2019-03-17: "4v4 mappool vot..." -Ragnarok
2019-03-17: "Why does this s..." -Laro24
2019-03-17: "someone had to ..." -Krzysiek
2019-03-17: "Next time pick ..." -Antix
2019-03-17: " v ..." -Ragnarok
2019-03-17: "GG WP ALL! E..." -ThunDer
2019-03-16: "v interesting m..." -Ragnarok
Latest matches
flag CX [09:03] [CDF]flag
flag CX [13:02] [CDF]flag
flag CX [11:00] [GpW]flag
flag CX [08:04] [GpW]flag
flag -t3> [12:07] CXflag
flag CX [09:02] -t3>flag
flag CX [11:08] -t3>flag
flag -t3> [04:03] CXflag
flag [GpW] [04:03] [CDF]flag
flag CX [13:03] -t3>flag
Latest forum posts
By: Vegito, in: A new balance proposalImproving rules 2019-03-19 23:00
I, as you said, didn't try the changes but watchin...
By: Ragnarok, in: A new balance proposalImproving rules 2019-03-19 20:49
If anything I'm in full support of it then. Wo...
By: Treylina, in: A new balance proposalImproving rules 2019-03-19 19:26
[quote="Ragnarok"]-snip-[/quote] The height ner...
By: Ragnarok, in: A new balance proposalImproving rules 2019-03-19 14:47
I'm all for rabbit inclusion, but since I don't ha...
By: Treylina, in: A new balance proposalImproving rules 2019-03-19 03:00
TL;DR: Try out the balance changes with the prov...
More...!

JJnet's forum

«Latest posts» «Latest threads» «Search» «User CP»

     JJ1 uses the gun from Math Blaster | [q] 2015-05-26 10:33
KRSplatinumavatar
JJnet user

Posts: 256
14
It's true.
Replies
MasterSven
[CDF]
avatar
JJnet user
Posts: 397
41
#1 | [q]2015-05-26 17:23
Splat, whats your theory on why Rag hasn't announced anything about the 2on2 tournament knockout stage yet?
Ragnarok
CX
avatar
JJnet user
Posts: 123
21
#2 | [q]2015-05-26 17:55
I'll paypal him some money if he gets it right!
KRSplatinum
avatar

JJnet user
Posts: 256
14
#3 | [q]2015-05-26 17:59
I guess that group stage isn't over yet, since groups are of 4 teams, and every team hasn't played 3 matches according to the spreadsheet.
Ragnarok
CX
avatar
JJnet user
Posts: 123
21
#4 | [q]2015-05-27 03:52
So close!!
KRSplatinum
avatar

JJnet user
Posts: 256
14
#5 | [q]2015-05-28 23:23
IMO, teams that played all 4 games should automatically advance to knockout stage. Actually groups had 5 teams, I was incorrect about 4 teams. 4SpR and PR played all 4 games. 4SpR went 4-0; PR went 1-3. C2 and L played 3 games, going 2-1 W/L. They should also advance. Therefore a 4-team bracket can be made with 4SpR, PR, C2 and L. Missing games should be regarded as a forfeit, although groups became uneven as some teams were disqualified: without counting wins to determine seeding, I would rely on counting at least how many games they actually played. Having fewer losses and fewer games played doesn't give a team an edge to enter a 4-team bracket. I would suggest a semi-final of (1) 4SpR vs (4) PR and (2) C2 vs (3) L, if there is a knockout stage.