-=-
Menu
Tournaments
Profile
Poll
Latest videos
Latest comments
2019-08-21: "ah heres regg..." -Loon
2019-08-21: "gg re" -Loon
2019-08-20: "nice lahm strat..." -ThunDer
2019-08-19: "hyp failed at F..." -ThunDer
2019-08-18: "bg" -ThunDer
2019-08-14: "dayum gurus, ni..." -[GpW]Urbs
2019-08-10: "gg wp ..." -Laro24
2019-08-10: " ..." -[GpW]Urbs
2019-08-10: "pwnd ..." -Plumbe
2019-08-10: "keep it up ..." -ThunDer
2019-08-10: "rpop very fun ..." -Ragnarok
2019-08-08: "omg lahm ..." -ThunDer
Latest matches
flag CC [06:03] [GpW]flag
flag [GpW] [07:00] CCflag
flag [GpW] [05:01] CXflag
flag CX [07:06] [GpW]flag
flag -t3> [05:02] CXflag
flag CX [05:04] -t3>flag
flag -t3> [05:04] [GpW]flag
flag CX [09:02] -t3>flag
flag -t3> [12:05] [GpW]flag
flag [GpW] [08:05] -t3>flag
Latest forum posts
By: SirEmentaler, in: What JJ2 level title best describes your sex life?JJ2 related 2019-08-21 20:45
I just wanted to say this topic was inspired by a ...
By: Slaz, in: What JJ2 level title best describes your sex life?JJ2 related 2019-08-20 14:13
ELEKTREK PYRAMID :dizzy:
By: PurpleJazz, in: What JJ2 level title best describes your sex life?JJ2 related 2019-08-19 06:44
15 Second Rush
By: Laro24, in: What JJ2 level title best describes your sex life?JJ2 related 2019-08-10 19:15
Nuclear Afterblast :whistling:
By: Plumbe, in: What JJ2 level title best describes your sex life?JJ2 related 2019-08-10 16:50
Wicked Wood :flex:
More...!

JJnet's forum

«Latest posts» «Latest threads» «Search» «User CP»

View post
GLaDOS
avatar
Return to thread2012-03-17 16:21
Quote:
I dunno Glados, seems to me that there is nothing wrong with the Y cw that you mention.
The whole point of this system is to force cw's cuz otherwise nobody would ever play them. So IMO the goal was achievedemo
And Y didn't abuse the rule.


You're still not understanding, Urbs. People like you are the reason I can't trust the admins anymore about what is considered abuse and what isn't. I am saying that the rule that you have 3 refuses at all is useless and has no effect whatsoever since any clan could force you to play a CW against them by challenging you three times in a row. The paragraph could be changed to "you can not refuse CW challenges if you have more than 20 points" and it would still work exactly the same way as now.

You wonder what is wrong with that CW? Well, as you probably know, RA rapidly closed down and reincarnated, especially around the time the CW was played. After they closed down their previous clan that had a decent amount of points, if I remember right, they founded Y and used the loophole in the 3 refuse rule to challenge CDF three times in a row and get a guaranteed win, as they had several much more skillful players than CDF had at that time.
This could be abused by any clan with more or less skilled players to forcefully take out clans in the middle point range (such as the current state of aEs), as the mid-range clan will lose 20 points rather than a nomrally appropriate lower number, due to the higher rank difference. Any skilled clan who would want to take out a clan with 20-30 points would simply create a new clan, challenge their target three times, win the clanwar (due to the skill difference, of course), bringing the targetted clan down to 0-10 points. The winning players would either continue in their new clan or return to the original clan.

This is exactly what happened when Y challenged CDF. No really skilled players were available at that time, so RA's members exploited that and founded Y to take CDF's points.

So, IMO, the only goal that was achieved was easy 20 points for Y and a great loss for CDF. I do not see what you can find so perfectly fair about this, Urbs.