-=-
Menu
Tournaments
Profile
Poll
Latest videos
Latest comments
2019-08-20: "nice lahm strat..." -ThunDer
2019-08-19: "hyp failed at F..." -ThunDer
2019-08-18: "bg" -ThunDer
2019-08-14: "dayum gurus, ni..." -[GpW]Urbs
2019-08-10: "gg wp ..." -Laro24
2019-08-10: " ..." -[GpW]Urbs
2019-08-10: "pwnd ..." -Plumbe
2019-08-10: "keep it up ..." -ThunDer
2019-08-10: "rpop very fun ..." -Ragnarok
2019-08-08: "omg lahm ..." -ThunDer
2019-08-08: "farming machine..." -ThunDer
2019-08-07: " ..." -batata
Latest matches
flag -t3> [05:02] CXflag
flag CX [05:04] -t3>flag
flag -t3> [05:04] [GpW]flag
flag CX [09:02] -t3>flag
flag -t3> [12:05] [GpW]flag
flag [GpW] [08:05] -t3>flag
flag -t3> [05:04] [GpW]flag
flag -t3> [11:02] [GpW]flag
flag [GpW] [06:05] -t3>flag
flag [GpW] [06:04] -t3>flag
Latest forum posts
By: PurpleJazz, in: What JJ2 level title best describes your sex life?JJ2 related 2019-08-19 06:44
15 Second Rush
By: Laro24, in: What JJ2 level title best describes your sex life?JJ2 related 2019-08-10 19:15
Nuclear Afterblast :whistling:
By: Plumbe, in: What JJ2 level title best describes your sex life?JJ2 related 2019-08-10 16:50
Wicked Wood :flex:
By: [GpW]Urbs, in: What JJ2 level title best describes your sex life?JJ2 related 2019-08-10 15:59
Jungles Edge :D
By: i:m, in: What JJ2 level title best describes your sex life?JJ2 related 2019-08-10 03:59
CREDITS
More...!

JJnet's forum

«Latest posts» «Latest threads» «Search» «User CP»

View post
GLaDOS
avatar
Return to thread2012-03-17 16:51
The CW refusal rule has not been changed between the CW in question and now, so it did happen under these refusal rules and could happen again at any time. I propose that rather than limiting it to three CW refuses, it should be limited to refusing clanwar challenges from three different clans that are at least one month old each (to prevent exploiting it through creating multiple new clans), or even just two different clans if you want to be a bit stricter and enforce some more CWs.
Another option would be disallowing newly formed clans from challenging one clan over and over.

In its current state, the rule is simply misleading, as there is no "cooldown" for re-challenging the same clan and CW challenge spam can be used to effectively bypass the rule.

[edit after being ninja'd by urbs:]
RA closed down and founded Y after a while, and one of the first actions they did was challenging CDF to a CW. After refusing the challenge, CDF was simply re-challenged, and when that challenge was also refused, CDF was once again re-challenged, now without the option of refusing due to the 3 refuse rule. This happened over a timespan of about one week. The CW was scheduled to 30 days after the final challenge, I think. So Y essentially got a kickstart of 20 additional points with the bonus of getting CDF out of the way.

The reason I consider the current rule ineffective and useless is mentioned above the [edit].