-=-
Menu
Tournaments
Profile
Poll
Latest videos
Latest comments
2018-10-12: "Now all we need..." -Jelly Jam
2018-10-10: "yay what a mile..." -Loon
2018-09-30: "Congrats t3, th..." -[GpW]Urbs
2018-09-29: "I knew you'd sa..." -Jelly Jam
2018-09-29: "Mourinho tactic..." -Vivando
2018-09-29: "All report SJ -..." -Ragnarok
2018-09-28: "invalid ladder...." -Krzysiek
2018-09-28: "LOLI can't beli..." -Jelly Jam
2018-09-28: "Well...can't su..." -Vivando
2018-09-16: "Needless to jus..." -ThunDer
Latest matches
flag -t3> [01:01] CXflag
flag [GpW] [07:03] -t3>flag
flag -t3> [07:07] [GpW]flag
flag [GpW] [09:05] CCflag
flag CX [11:07] -t3>flag
flag [GpW] [12:07] CXflag
flag CX [09:03] [GpW]flag
flag CX [10:05] [GpW]flag
flag [GpW] [09:08] CXflag
flag [GpW] [13:01] CCflag
Latest forum posts

JJnet's forum

«Latest posts» «Latest threads» «Search» «User CP»

View post
Jelly Jam
avatar
Return to thread2018-05-11 14:04
I don't support the idea of uneven numbers of teams per group.

I mentioned a leauge system before as well and that would be our best bet, especially if the tournament gets fewer teams this time. But if 8 teams sign up like last time, I'd rather stick with the groups and elimination stages, to prevent potential forfeits due to a bigger ammount of matches the teams would have to play.

If a leauge system does get accepted, I'm all for the good old playoffs between the top 4 teams, where the team with a higher ranking has a small advantage of some kind over their opponent.