-=-
Menu
Tournaments
Profile
Poll
Latest videos
Latest comments
Latest matches
flag -t3> [06:03] [CDF]flag
flag [CDF] [05:04] -t3>flag
flag -t3> [05:02] [CDF]flag
flag CC [07:04] [CDF]flag
flag -t3> [11:07] [CDF]flag
flag -t3> [13:03] [CDF]flag
flag [CDF] [14:05] -t3>flag
flag -t3> [10:05] [CDF]flag
flag -t3> [07:04] [CDF]flag
flag -t3> [10:05] [CDF]flag
Latest forum posts
By: Splat, in: cheating and admins » Site suggestions 2021-04-05 15:42
It's not always plausible to open JJ2, especially ...
By: MaximuS , in: cheating and admins » Site suggestions 2021-03-25 01:15
I’m so happy that a lot of people feel connected...
By: Splat, in: Watching people drown » Ask Tira 2021-03-24 15:52
This question is about letting people drown in the...
By: Splat, in: cheating and admins » Site suggestions 2021-03-23 13:49
Radar is actually ez 2 maek, just click on the map...
By: Kev, in: cheating and admins » Site suggestions 2021-03-14 19:06
lmao k i hope this is my last comment in this issu...
By: Kev, in: cheating and admins » Site suggestions 2021-03-14 16:06
If gpw rejects the council then thats absolutely l...
By: MasterSven, in: cheating and admins » Site suggestions 2021-03-14 14:25
Basically we had a council like that before and we...
By: cooba, in: cheating and admins » Site suggestions 2021-03-14 01:18
This should have been done 10 years ago.
By: Vivando, in: cheating and admins » Site suggestions 2021-03-13 16:40
I am happy about this change. Mad props to Kev for...
By: Kev, in: cheating and admins » Site suggestions 2021-03-13 13:15
ok some time has passed since i sent the council i...
By: Splat, in: Primetime - Rag vs Splat » Off topic 2021-03-13 00:56
Thanks for making me win, m0ti, however I don't th...
By: Vivando, in: [MULTI] Domination map making contest! » JJ2 related 2021-03-11 23:31
Congratulations to Violet! i-) :goodgame:
By: MaximuS , in: [MULTI] Domination map making contest! » JJ2 related 2021-03-11 20:49
The DOM map making contest has ended with Violet C...
By: Pariah, in: cheating and admins » Site suggestions 2021-03-10 07:22
@cooba: yep.
By: Splat, in: ¿How to play CtF for rabbits? » JJ2 related 2021-03-07 22:58
Q: Jazz Jackrabbit 2's Capture the Flag gamemode i...
By: [GpW]Urbs, in: cheating and admins » Site suggestions 2021-03-07 21:39
I understand why some of our players are pissed, b...
By: cooba, in: cheating and admins » Site suggestions 2021-03-06 16:09
You're a psycho.
By: Pariah, in: cheating and admins » Site suggestions 2021-03-06 04:13
well thanks Kev, i never herd of any of this. i ne...
By: cooba, in: cheating and admins » Site suggestions 2021-03-06 02:14
CX was a mistake
By: MasterSven, in: cheating and admins » Site suggestions 2021-03-05 00:00
I don't think the rules changed that much over the...
By: Vivando, in: cheating and admins » Site suggestions 2021-03-04 22:16
Kev already replied quite thoroughly, but here are...
By: Kev, in: cheating and admins » Site suggestions 2021-03-04 11:58
Let me give you an update on where we are now, bas...
By: Pariah, in: cheating and admins » Site suggestions 2021-03-04 08:05
so where we are now is we have this open wound of ...
By: Lithium, in: What are some of the best maps that never were in mappool? » JJ2 related 2021-03-01 13:28
[quote="DanZeal"]Bannerwatch Base: https://www.jaz...
By: Vivando, in: What are some of the best maps that never were in mappool? » JJ2 related 2021-02-19 16:43
[quote="Kev"]and /c fioctfa by Vivando8D[/quote] ...
By: Kev, in: What are some of the best maps that never were in mappool? » JJ2 related 2021-02-18 22:46
I think its called "an overnight skirmish", a map ...
By: DanZeal, in: What are some of the best maps that never were in mappool? » JJ2 related 2021-02-18 13:55
Bannerwatch Base: https://www.jazz2online.com/down...
By: Splat, in: What are some of the best maps that never were in mappool? » JJ2 related 2021-02-18 13:14
Hollow of the Haunted is a level that after playte...
By: Vivando, in: What are some of the best maps that never were in mappool? » JJ2 related 2021-02-17 20:29
So far: https://www.jazz2online.com/downloads/8100...
By: Splat, in: What are some of the best maps that never were in mappool? » JJ2 related 2021-02-17 19:00
I think there are plenty of them, here are 3: -...
By: MaximuS , in: [MULTI] Domination map making contest! » JJ2 related 2021-01-21 20:36
Update 21.01.21 First, I have to admit that the o...
By: Loon, in: [MULTI] Domination map making contest! » JJ2 related 2021-01-21 08:54
creating a DOM map takes quite a lot of time, espe...
By: Splat, in: [MULTI] Domination map making contest! » JJ2 related 2021-01-18 23:34
Just 2 days until the deadline, any entries?
By: MaximuS , in: [MULTI] Domination map making contest! » JJ2 related 2020-12-13 04:50
Hello! Hi! It’s time for yet another JJnet map ...
By: removed, in: JJ2+ anti-radar discussion » JJ2 related 2020-11-29 20:56
Antiradar is disabled for PNA1 and PNA2 servers.
By: Vivando, in: JJ2+ anti-radar discussion » JJ2 related 2020-11-29 19:47
Okay my bad, I didn't pay attention which server(s...
By: removed, in: JJ2+ anti-radar discussion » JJ2 related 2020-11-29 14:41
[quote]As far as I know, PNAs actually rolled back...
By: Vivando, in: JJ2+ anti-radar discussion » JJ2 related 2020-11-27 18:26
As far as I know, PNAs actually rolled back to Plu...
By: Naps, in: JJ2+ anti-radar discussion » JJ2 related 2020-11-27 18:00
According to the plus readme,that bug is fixed,i h...
More...!

JJnet's forum

«Latest posts» «Latest threads» «Search» «User CP»

Latest 50 posts
By: Splat, in: cheating and admins » Site suggestions 2021-04-05 15:42
It's not always plausible to open JJ2, especially for the sake of dialogue. Public availability of computers is scarce in most areas. Loading JJ2 onto a public computer with limited availability is also more deliberate. Thereby talking on WWW instead of JJ2 needn't be disincentivized.

Furthermore since I retired from playing ladders, yet I played about 8 years worth of ladders, denying players the ability to communicate about ladder will just lead to a lack of communication. That maybe fine if ladder is supposed to continue with just invitee participants, although that'd really be a change of events.

Granted that this season of ladder appears to have only CDF and T3 jointly vyeing for 200 points, with GPW and CX not participating, and CC not distinctly contending for 1st place. This scenario could be actually optimal for ladder overall, if there's just marginal interest from CC, CX, and GPW. Clans that are most invested into the ladder won't have random other teams competing. Most particularly, if players from T3 and CDF are controlling the rules of ladder, there's no rationale for other teams to compete on the basis of a fair tournament competition, with an (arguably imbalanced) level playing field.

My personal opinion technically disregards the current season; I just don't want to play anymore ladder. I'm not motivated to play so many games nonstop. This thread isn't about me though and my point overall is that -- it's pointless to try and decide who gets to share their thoughts on a topic (such as radar usage during ladders) because that will make you thoughtless and oblivious, and most people would sooner be thoughtful than thoughtless; that much is glaringly obvious.
By: MaximuS , in: cheating and admins » Site suggestions 2021-03-25 01:15
I’m so happy that a lot of people feel connected to the scene, I would be much happier if they would take their time and play.

Private opinion. People who don’t participate should have little to say on how things are or should be.
By: Splat, in: Watching people drown » Ask Tira 2021-03-24 15:52
This question is about letting people drown in their own mistakes.

For a hyperbolic illustrative example, just imagine this scenario.

Some people are standing over a frozen lake. Let three of these people be called X, Y, and Z.

For some arbitrary reason, a fight starts among the 3 of them.

X and Y continue fighting violently and maliciously while Z tries to avoid or escape the brawl. Unsurprisingly, during the violence, X and Y fall into the frozen lake, and are then incapable of climbing out to safety. Z, feeling betrayed by the onset of violence and threatened by involvement within the fight, neglects to offer any help to the others, contending that if they didn't want to drown in a frozen lake, then they shouldn't have put themselves in harm's way while risking the safety of the people around them.

So my question would be, is it smart for Z to just ignore them, based upon the notion that if X and Y were saved, they could just repeatedly get Z into trouble? Or is it smarter for Z to try and save them, although risking a furtherance of danger and harm?

In other words — if someone is being selfdestructive in order to smite you: should you try to help them in lieu of their goal of hurting you, or should you just observe their selfdestructive behavior and conclude that the consequences of their actions are their own punishment enough that there's no reason to intervene?
By: Splat, in: cheating and admins » Site suggestions 2021-03-23 13:49
Radar is actually ez 2 maek, just click on the map several times at once, it's basic echolocation.
By: Kev, in: cheating and admins » Site suggestions 2021-03-14 19:06
lmao k i hope this is my last comment in this issue.
so from what i understood among other things gpw is very sceptical about future decisions/behavior of admins, as theoretically admins could just make clanladder related decisions on their own again, without the council.

i think there are 2 scenarios in case gpw joins the council/ladder:

1) eventually admins break their word and fck things up, in which case you have verification of your initial doubts about this and simply leave jjnet behind for good.
2) against your expectations admins do not fck things up or do some bad stuff, the council runs nicely and makes the clanladder related decisions, and the few gpw members who perhaps might be interested in playing in the ladder have more power in it.

youre not losing anything if you find it out by simply giving it a try.

either way, if you ever change your mind in the future i guess gpw has their place in the council. take care
By: Kev, in: cheating and admins » Site suggestions 2021-03-14 16:06
If gpw rejects the council then thats absolutely legit. As i got some feedback now i just want to make sure that the reason for the rejection isnt based on some misunderstanding about the role of certain (even quite inactive) jjnet admins. Admins representing their clans in the council have the same rights/power as everyone else in the council and they arent supposed to push for their own personal opinions but to represent the opinion of their clan. Again, a decision is only made when all clans agree to it. So no, admins dont have special power in the council.
By: MasterSven, in: cheating and admins » Site suggestions 2021-03-14 14:25
Basically we had a council like that before and we delivered a lot of good work imo and my expectations are that this will be so again.

https://jazzjackrabbit.net/index.php?league=1&season=1&op=com&id=668

Check out the first line of this newspost.
By: cooba, in: cheating and admins » Site suggestions 2021-03-14 01:18
This should have been done 10 years ago.
By: Vivando, in: cheating and admins » Site suggestions 2021-03-13 16:40
I am happy about this change. Mad props to Kev for suggesting this idea. The main problem with the JJNet crew was always that the decision making power was divided unequally among active clans, which naturally caused many complaints among the years. Once the councils are complete, we can ensure that every decision is applied with full reason, as full consensus among the clan representatives needs to be achieved. Time will tell how this new system will work for evolving the competition itself as well, as I'm sure that many of the council members (new ones too) will have fresh ideas to bring up.

Meanwhile we, the people running JJNet as its crew members no longer need to worry about how to deal with the rules or how to make judgements, but can focus on site maintenance and development. Last spring I retired as a JJNet admin after having had sort of a burnout from administrating the ladder. I had been doing a lot of its tasks alone, culminating in the cheating investigation which was a heavy burden on its own, with lots of external pressure from all directions too. Luckily I wasn't forced to make any final decisions on my own. Nowadays I'm still part of the crew as a site developer, though I have been assisting with admin decisions too in the background. Teamwork is way more fun than being under pressure alone. I am anyway happy to give the rest of the decision-making power away to the council (which I am part of anyway), to divide power and workload more equally among other people too.
By: Kev, in: cheating and admins » Site suggestions 2021-03-13 13:15
ok some time has passed since i sent the council invitation message to urbs to share it with gpw discord server. as im not exactly sure whether he shared the message in it or not, id like to post it here too, so every gpw member can read it. so here it goes:

In order to make the clanladder competition more democratic and fair, jjnet crew has agreed to transfer the decision making power for every clanladder-competition related decision from jjnet admins to the clan councils. This includes decisions about rules changes, judgement about rules violations (which was different in the past) and mapool changes, for example.

Curently there is already a rules council and a mapool council. We intend to use those two. depending on what issues come up, different councils could be needed.
The councils are supposed to consist of about two people of each presented clan, in order to discuss things. Regardless of the exact number of clan members in the council, each clan will always have 1 vote when it comes to decision making. Every clan’s vote is equal. This way all present clans have equal power. Decisions will only be made and executed if ALL present clans agree to it. To give an example: if its suggested to increase timelimit to 15 minutes and 3/4 clans vote “yes” but 1/4 clans votes “no”, then the timelimit will stay the same.

At least that’s how the rules council is supposed to work. We will probably need a slightly different approach (other than all clans agreeing on all maps) in the mapool council. We will decide about how the mapool is selected, when all council members are present there.

For this system to work, all included clans will be required to be willing to make a compromise every now and then, as decisions about rules can only be made when all clans agree. But as there are reasonable people in every clan, we hope that this system will be successful in managing the clanladder-competition.

Jjnet crew will continue to run the website and other jjnet related issues. But everything related to the clanladder-competition will be decided in common agreement by all present clans in the council and not by jjnet admins, anymore. This way all clanladder related decisions are made by a more representative group of people.

Ideas and suggestions are welcome, too.


if gpw wants to join the council, please let us know. ofc feel free to refuse the invitation if you dont want to be part of the council.
By: Splat, in: Primetime - Rag vs Splat » Off topic 2021-03-13 00:56
Thanks for making me win, m0ti, however I don't think that you're actually authorized to declare who is/was the winnier of this debate.

I must decline the victory, because Ragnarok didn't offer any terms of unconditional surrender, so the debate/flamewar must continue

BTW, saw your comment about me, it was like weeds/months ago, just I canot comment on this site anymore. May teh love be with u
By: Vivando, in: [MULTI] Domination map making contest! » JJ2 related 2021-03-11 23:31
Congratulations to Violet! emo emo
By: MaximuS , in: [MULTI] Domination map making contest! » JJ2 related 2021-03-11 20:49
The DOM map making contest has ended with Violet CLM taking the first place with two outstanding submissions - Genshin Over It and King of Wuwang Hill

I would like to thank everyone who took part, as well as those who unfortunately did not meet the deadline, for showing intrest throughout the time.


Reality check.
In the initial timeframe, we received two entries, the winning ones, the only ones submitted. Those two are super high quality, with stunning visuals and creative gameplay.
At the first deadline I decided to extend the contest by a month since the times are tough and a good chunk of the initial time was overlapping with x-mas.
The extension was justified but the condition on minimum amount of submissions to end the contest was a bad, very unfair move to the person who has actually submitted in time.

I believe that the high quality of those entries might have discouraged other people from potentially entering the competition.


This contest had to end to make space for better, newer things.

Kind Regards,
Bee.
By: Pariah, in: cheating and admins » Site suggestions 2021-03-10 07:22
@cooba: yep.
By: Splat, in: ¿How to play CtF for rabbits? » JJ2 related 2021-03-07 22:58
Q: Jazz Jackrabbit 2's Capture the Flag gamemode is too complicated. How do you play CtF?

A: A score in CTF is made by joining either blue or red team, stealing the flag of the opposing color's team from their base, and preventing the enemy team from stealing the ally flag, then bringing the enemy flag to the ally base. A score can only be made when the ally flag is still at the ally base. If you bring the enemy flag to your base, while an enemy player has possession of your flag, there will not be a score. CTF by default is played with 3 maximum HP. If the JJ2 gamefiles aren't patched to version 1.23 or more, then do not touch the border of the level, unless there is a wall of masked tiles there.
By: [GpW]Urbs, in: cheating and admins » Site suggestions 2021-03-07 21:39
I understand why some of our players are pissed, but I would prefer if they took their anger out on their opponents in a more direct way via ladder and clanwars.

Now I need to have a talk with GpWers (I apologize to all parties for not doing this sooner, will come around to the server next week), but looking at it from a distance I can see why this split happened, but I can't condone it, even though I'm glad that the initial ruling was overturned (where, btw I'd like to thank the admins for swiftly deleting the initial malicious spamfest from one of our competitors).

Saying that we should all get along would be just plain stupid, but I do hope that our players see that the admins are trying to move things in a new direction. SJ wrote and apologized to me even though I don't think he owed me an apology so I can only give kudos there. Now it could be that the differences are irreconcilable, but I hope that this isn't going to be the case.
By: cooba, in: cheating and admins » Site suggestions 2021-03-06 16:09
You're a psycho.
By: Pariah, in: cheating and admins » Site suggestions 2021-03-06 04:13
well thanks Kev, i never herd of any of this. i never had any problem with grytolle and kyro being admins,

[quote[Kev[--> oh boy that escalated quickly! Jjnet is not Russian/Chinese government.]
well im suggesting it should be. overly democratic institutions are a mistake.


[qoute[cooba[CX was a mistake]
i disagree, CX is great. gpw would never be as great as it is without CX to beat us into shape.
By: cooba, in: cheating and admins » Site suggestions 2021-03-06 02:14
CX was a mistake
By: MasterSven, in: cheating and admins » Site suggestions 2021-03-05 00:00
I don't think the rules changed that much over the past few years, especially in a way that would allow GpW to perform much better. Speaking of rules, still looking forward to the completion of the councils. I already got a list of rules to tweak.
By: Vivando, in: cheating and admins » Site suggestions 2021-03-04 22:16
Kev already replied quite thoroughly, but here are some points I wanted to add based on my personal point of view.

The same night when we had a chat with a number of people from GpW on Discord, I sent a personal apology to Urbs via Messenger. To my knowledge Urbs has been very inactive on Discord lately, so I thought I would catch him faster this way and I did. However, he wanted to handle the situation later with peace as he was really busy at that time to my understanding.

A bit over a week later a part of us JJNet crew finally had a short chat with Urbs on Discord about the situation. He promised to go through the related conversations and I was hoping to hear back from him, but I can only imagine his total message count on Discord after being inactive there for so long, so I'm under the assumption that he is still busy going through the conversations on his minimal spare time. We briefly talked about writing some kind of an official JJNet statement too, but to my understanding Urbs wanted to try to talk to his clanmates first. Anyway I can only speak for myself at this point.

I have stated this on other channels than JJNet already, but anyway I'm here as a JJNet crew member to emphasize that since the cheating evidence became unclear based on the public feedback, I fully support the decision to lift the bans and I apologize to A7med and Pavlus for this rushed decision and to all others whose feelings were hurt from it.
By: Kev, in: cheating and admins » Site suggestions 2021-03-04 11:58
Let me give you an update on where we are now, based on what I know:

sj and me had a discord chat with a7med lazar naps lahm and urbs being present from gpw. there we presented our concluding point of view about what happened and apologized to a7med/pav and gpw for the things which we believe we did wrong. (Pav wasn’t present in that group due to limited user number. But I guess he got the message.) if you are interested in reading our message, here it is: https://imgur.com/qQpzxxA

Loon had a conversation with lahm where he tried to make peace and apologized to lahm and whole gpw for what he thinks he did wrong.

in the past i asked jjnet crew if we want to post a public concluding statement from our side but I didn’t really get a clear answer.

Next, a few weeks ago we decided to transfer all decision making power for EVERY clanladder-competition related decision from jjnet admins to the (existing) clan councils. I think it applied to rules changes and mapool changes in the past already. Now it includes judgement about rules violations and bans, too. This means that clanladder-competition related decisions are not made by jjnet admins anymore but by the clans who decide things together in a more democratic/fair way with equal power. We had a brief conversation with urbs about the drama recently. Afaik he wanted to read up the gpw chat and talk to gpw. Gpw is invited to be part of decision-making in the council, too. We sent urbs the whole message of that council idea (including all details) and are waiting for him to share it with gpw group chat on discord so you can make up your minds about it. But urbs is not responding anymore for quite some time now lol. So now that you made this post here we might just send you the whole message with all the details via somebody else I guess.

This is where we and jjnet are now. Now let me reply to some of your statements.

“someone develops a new way of playing and because you think your way of playing is great, you presume they cheated.”
--> we accused them of cheating bcs of the “evidence” that was collected. If we had not noticed so many moments in a7med and pav (before knowing about field of vision shift mentioned by SE) then there would not have been any bans in the first place, regardless of people’s personal opinions.

“so, why am i here? “ “im here to help you, to show you the way out of the mud. “ “you still believe gpw cheated then stand for what u believe and ban them, damn the evidence and the jurys and ban them on your power as admin”
--> oh boy that escalated quickly! Jjnet is not Russian/Chinese government. Not caring about evidence would be very arbitrary, mean and unfair. It doesn’t matter whether we personally believe they cheated or not. All that matters is evidence. If all jjnet admins just personally believed a7med/pav cheated but there was zero evidence, then there would have been no bans. Eventho it looked like a clear case to us before knowing about FOV-shift, rushing the bans without discussing the evidence more sufficiently with gpw/3rd party people was kinda arbitrary too, and I apologize for that once more. But again, after reevaluating the evidence and seeing that many moments became unclear jjnet reversed the bans right away instead of justyfing them and everyone is free to play since then. Like I said, the clan council is the judge of cheating accusations now, not jjnet admins.

“some people planing on creating another ladder site.”
--> thats the way to go if you still want to play competitively and hate jjnet so much despite the facts that…
1) jjnet corrected the mistake and unbanned everyone. (everyone is free to play and all of gpw who still wanted to play ladders even after the drama happened could have done so the whole season already - but ye make a new laddersite)
2) the two admins (gry&kyro) which some of gpw complained so much about are totally inactive and have other things to care about.
3) I guess people's/gpw's problems with single admins dont even matter much anymore anyway bcs of 4)
4) all clanladder-competition related decisions are now being made in agreement of all council clans with equal power, instead of jjnet admins, including judgement about rules violations.
5) at least 3 of the involved people tried to make peace and apologized for the things they think they did wrong. While the others myb don’t care at all cuz they are inactive and busy with life or perhaps they just don’t see a mistake bcs...
- myb they think doing the investigation for contributing to fair play was legit (remember there wouldn’t have been bans without finding so many moments in the first place)
- myb they think rushing the bans was legit bcs it looked like a totally clear case to them
- myb they think unbanning a7med/pav right away after reevaluating the evidence corrected the mistake anyway.
Idk what's on their mind regarding all this.




By: Pariah, in: cheating and admins » Site suggestions 2021-03-04 08:05
so where we are now is we have this open wound of people accused of cheating(A7med fr) and they cant be convicted of cheating,(but circumstantial evidence and with the lack of an impartial witness) nor acquitted as admins still clearly believe they cheated. i mean to argue and explain how we got here; years ago cc dominated and maintained psychological superiority, sometime in the clouded past some unknown player created cx clan, collected all the best players to it and secured and achieved a dominance unparalleled by anything ive seen. thus twas during this epoch a group of mediocre players collected with gpw, and played ladders against the vaunted cx; the results not close for gpw, some called cx cheaters etc. eventually gpw played better and thought they could win a season against a mostly idle cx, but no cx pawned them again! ha haw. now gpw didnt blame their defeat on inferior play, but blamed the rules and at once set to work picking on the rules; after some incessint attacks, the admins of jjnet being weak bowed to gpw and changed the rules. with the admins put it their place, and the rules more to their liking we now believed we could win a season, and set to playing ladders as before. with the rules changed cx played more active to win the season, but gpw played close ladders and often won vs cx: apparently my team developed a new way of playing, a way i never learned and barely comprehend(they want me to s vs two r ive done this but then e always scores dying one second after i do.) as far as i can tell this new way of playing is to expect to be as lucky as king olaf and to steal all the luck u can.(ive been kind of a fifth wheel playing with them as its a stupid way to play, and i never accepted it.)

cx being unwilling to relinquish full psychological superiority felt gpw was cheating, collected and fed evidence to admins.(admins being weak they go along with it exactly how they change the rules for gpw.) this anti cheating campaign culminating with the clanwar. after much labours collecting evidence and organizing it; the admins posts a huge mountain entirely of circumstantial evidence which stands stalwart till the jury of se and yacinedz criticize it.

and here we are... admins stuck in mud... cant move forward as after such a devastating failure of a case now firerabbit and A7med will never beleive they cheated, and any jury would do the same as se and yacinedz. nor backwards as admins still believe they cheated... so here we are, gpw so offended they are dead, cx so devastated they are dead, and some people planing on creating another ladder site.

so, why am i here? .... i used to play another game which had a wonderful ladder, perfectly functional and great in every way; but one day some people disagreed with how the admins ran the site, i posted something with them. the admins kill the site..... the game is ruined; i feel as if my post was so devastating it killed the site. i dont want this to happer again, i love this site. anything shaker or anybody else builds will be inferior to this....
im here to help you, to show you the way out of the mud.
1: gpw didnt cheat; i played with slayer when he cheated, it was so much fun, it was so easy; so easy that it was obvious to me when i saw the cheat accusation he cheated. when cc set up the game vs slayer and caught him cheating, they got cut to ribbons; a leet cc team with cc at the zenith of her power beaten silly. this is not what happened here: cx coulda won if they woulda caught firerabbit. ive played vs gpw, and i agree with maximus, "for a long time playing against you guys wasn't fun" someone develops a new way of playing and because you think your way of playing is great, you presume they cheated. ive played vs jety and known exactly where shes going and when she going their and nineteen times out of twenty i ether get there too late or get in her way and cant hit her. if gpw ever comes back to play it is only going to get worse as they improve. they are hell to play against but if ye dont play you wont learn. you owe gpw an apoligee for accusing them of cheating. and you also owe cx an apoligee for failing them, they trusted you and you failed badly.(they should have made the accusation themselfs, but you made it for them and you failed.)
2: you still believe gpw cheated then stand for what u believe and ban them, damn the evidence and the jurys and ban them on your power as admin! throw off the chains of pretend democracy which make you weak and be really and truly in charge of and in control of your own site.

you have dishonored the site; go left or right, i dont care which; gpw and cx have been at each other for a long time, this is not your problem. your charge is the site, restore the honor of the site. emo
By: Lithium, in: What are some of the best maps that never were in mappool? » JJ2 related 2021-03-01 13:28
DanZeal wrote:
Bannerwatch Base: https://www.jazz2online.com/downloads/7017/bannerwatch-base/


I'm flattered emo
By: Vivando, in: What are some of the best maps that never were in mappool? » JJ2 related 2021-02-19 16:43
Kev wrote:
and /c fioctfa by Vivando8D


Isn't /c bj better though? emo
By: Kev, in: What are some of the best maps that never were in mappool? » JJ2 related 2021-02-18 22:46
I think its called "an overnight skirmish", a map by Valmango8D (if that was his name).

and /c fioctfa by Vivando8D
By: DanZeal, in: What are some of the best maps that never were in mappool? » JJ2 related 2021-02-18 13:55
Bannerwatch Base: https://www.jazz2online.com/downloads/7017/bannerwatch-base/

And Nightfall in Noobland would be interesting: https://www.jazz2online.com/downloads/4969/nightfall-in-noobland/
By: Splat, in: What are some of the best maps that never were in mappool? » JJ2 related 2021-02-18 13:14
Hollow of the Haunted is a level that after playtesting, I thought it could be good for ladder mappool. I recommend considering it at the next mappool update.

Energy blast is a special movement ability, in the form of a custom weapon. The presence of energy blast in the map makes it unique among CTF levels, but the energy blast exists with an ammo limitation that keeps the level in balance, between a gimmick-level emphasizing charging around the arena with no observation of gravity, and a repetition of a traditional theme along with a flow-functional layout.

It's one that I'd like to play more extensively sometime. Evaluating the balance between sides is a concern beyond just first impression.
By: Vivando, in: What are some of the best maps that never were in mappool? » JJ2 related 2021-02-17 20:29
So far: https://www.jazz2online.com/downloads/8100/hollow-of-the-haunted/
By: Splat, in: What are some of the best maps that never were in mappool? » JJ2 related 2021-02-17 19:00
I think there are plenty of them, here are 3:

- Mulch

This tiny level lacks a layout, and for ammo you only get one random powerup on spawn. It's mindless and chaotic and has been a favorite during those moments where no one wanted to strategize, they just wanted to spam powered up weapons, and run back and forth.

- n00bed! v2

This CTF level is symmetrically balanced and adequately sized, however compared to mappool levels its layout is far more simplistic. That simplicity may be its appeal, since the layout is so easily understood and memorized.

- Marshland of Evil

A common find in public games, this level features a complicated asymmetrical layout and is large enough for many players. It may just be too large for ladder matches, though, and maybe not balanced enough. The variety of paths around the map, and the choice of a great tileset, make it fun to play.
By: MaximuS , in: [MULTI] Domination map making contest! » JJ2 related 2021-01-21 20:36
Update 21.01.21
First, I have to admit that the original deadline was too short. I could hardly find any time or energy within the last few weeks and I’m not at all surprised with the current outcome.
The contest has been extended, by default, one big extra month (new finish date: 21.02.2021) with a minimum number of 4 entries before the contest will come to an end.

Besides the glory and awe, I’m adding £20 as a reward for the first place.

Happy JCSing!
By: Loon, in: [MULTI] Domination map making contest! » JJ2 related 2021-01-21 08:54
creating a DOM map takes quite a lot of time, especially to make it visually appealing.
I didn't have time to create a DOM map in time, but I might whip something up later this year.
By: Splat, in: [MULTI] Domination map making contest! » JJ2 related 2021-01-18 23:34
Just 2 days until the deadline, any entries?
By: Vivando, in: [MULTI] Domination map making contest! » JJ2 related 2020-12-13 18:10
emo
By: MaximuS , in: [MULTI] Domination map making contest! » JJ2 related 2020-12-13 04:50
Hello! Hi!
It’s time for yet another JJnet map making contest! It has been a while since we had one – over a year to be exact. With the multi-ladder seeing more traffic lately we’ve decided to announce this very competition.

This time we are looking to expand the DOM mappool by a new map (or a few maps) created by the community.

These are the rules regarding entries:
1. Maximum of two submissions per person but try to shoot for quality over quantity.
2. We are looking for new maps, remakes of currently existing maps will not be taken into consideration.
3. Use of angelscirpt is allowed with respect for FPS impact, the map has to be accessible by players with lower end machines as well as those using some better gear to play who could also encounter FPS drops.
4. The levels must be uploaded to Jazz2Online so that they are easily available to anyone to download.
5. Once submitted, levels are allowed to be edited until the contest closes. Any changes have to be announced and described to explain what changed.

An advice from me regarding the maps:
- smaller maps can and probably should have more than two control points as to allow for more counter-play with smaller teams
- the levels should be easily readable for the player so he can tell what is happening on the screen
- all characters should be playable in a level (Spaz too) this means that tricks such as wall-jumping should not be necessary to reach all important areas of those levels, such as powerups, carrots or control points

The contest ends on the 20th of January 2021 so you have roughly 5 weeks to submit your works. Just as with previous contests, a team of judges will be selected to pick the winner(winners?) and the map will be added to the DOM mappool afterwards.

Entries:
Genshin Over It / King of Wuwang Hill by Violet CLM
By: removed, in: JJ2+ anti-radar discussion » JJ2 related 2020-11-29 20:56
Antiradar is disabled for PNA1 and PNA2 servers.
By: Vivando, in: JJ2+ anti-radar discussion » JJ2 related 2020-11-29 19:47
Okay my bad, I didn't pay attention which server(s) were in question. Sorry about that.

Not sure what's causing the antiradar issues (if any) though.
By: removed, in: JJ2+ anti-radar discussion » JJ2 related 2020-11-29 14:41
Quote:
As far as I know, PNAs actually rolled back to Plus version 5.6 due to having crashing problems with 5.7.

Please don't spread bs. The only server I rolled back to 5.6 was PN Tests. But that was temporarily. All PN servers are currently on 5.7.
By: Vivando, in: JJ2+ anti-radar discussion » JJ2 related 2020-11-27 18:26
As far as I know, PNAs actually rolled back to Plus version 5.6 due to having crashing problems with 5.7. So if you're trying out some things in PNAs, they might not work exactly the same as in other servers running 5.7, even if you're running the latest version yourself. Now, I don't remember how this affects certain antiradar features/fixes.
By: Naps, in: JJ2+ anti-radar discussion » JJ2 related 2020-11-27 18:00
According to the plus readme,that bug is fixed,i haven't directly paid clear attention to see if this bug still occurs,but i can say that i haven't encountered it so far in the newest version,so that being said i do not think this is still a problem unless you found an alternative way to reproduce it
By: DanZeal, in: JJ2+ anti-radar discussion » JJ2 related 2020-11-24 18:54
Kev wrote:
you can definitely hear rabbits getting hit from far offscreen.


I have also noticed this.
By: Kev, in: JJ2+ anti-radar discussion » JJ2 related 2020-11-23 17:11
dunno if this was mentioned somewhere already: you can definitely hear rabbits getting hit from far offscreen. i was also told you can hear copter sound from offscreen, but personally i havent experienced that yet.
By: stijn, in: JJ2+ anti-radar discussion » JJ2 related 2020-10-07 19:27
Thanks for the report, Kev. It would be incredibly helpful if the people who reported this to you could make themselves known and tell a bit more about what exactly they experienced, because (for example) there are a lot of systems that influence the behaviour of the flag arrows and having more information would help us verify what the issue really is.
By: Kev, in: JJ2+ anti-radar discussion » JJ2 related 2020-10-04 10:27
1) if i remember correctly some people were still complaining about warping opponents. personally i dont experience any lag with antiradar.
2) it was said the flag arrow sometimes points to a totally different direction than the direction where the enemy really is located. personally i dont think i've experienced such thing so far.
3) it was mentioned sometimes people dont get hit by long-distance seekers when they get hit far offscreen. i tested that with someone and we couldn't verify that problem - the hits worked fine.
4) it was also said sometimes people dont get hit when they respawn after using a warp and get shot instantly. we also tested that and couldn't verify the problem - the hits worked fine. dunno if thats different for other people with higher ping.
By: cooba, in: JJ2+ anti-radar discussion » JJ2 related 2020-10-03 13:30
Thanks for the report.

It would be helpful to specify what "lag" particularly means in this instance.
By: DanZeal, in: JJ2+ anti-radar discussion » JJ2 related 2020-10-02 20:44
Some players are still reporting more lag when using antiradar.
I don't.
By: cooba, in: JJ2+ anti-radar discussion » JJ2 related 2020-09-28 20:10
Still waiting.
By: Splat, in: Wimbledon Duel Rankings » Published Steel Duels cases 2020-09-26 03:51
I didn't have this info at that time. You can be #1 now!
By: Splat, in: JJ2+ Middle of the screen messages » JJ2 related 2020-09-16 04:05
This setting "NoBigEchoes=True" is alleviating the concern of the thread which is a genuine question, thus letting the question remain unanswered is worse than reviving the thread. Absolutely no need to "disactivate this whole topic" for the sole reason it's been 5 years, just add it to the plus readme and there wouldn't be this issue initially. The thread on the forum is not the cause of concern in this scenario, the "middle of the screen messages" are the concurrent issue. There is not enough posts on this forum to justify arguing over thread revivals.
By: removed, in: Wimbledon Duel Rankings » Published Steel Duels cases 2020-09-16 00:46
UPDATE on the tournament last round the match you forgot to add splat

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/706861156945494019/710247302597443624/unknown.png