« ? should esports be illegal in the confederacy ¿ »
=-> note that while one mainstream view would equate "esports" with a "video game tournament" contrarily another point of view (confederate)
would argue that a football player cannot participate in esports without getting cut from the team since in the confederacy,
all "multi-sport athletes" require explicit approval from the athletic director and have to arrange their schedule so that any "video game tournaments"
wouldn`t conflict with any SEC bowl games (this reference roughly translates to a counter-cultural term for a football game and/or rugby tournament , etc.)
- Although this argument could seem like: ... It only applies to floridians or participants or players of rugby or tackle football players in the confederacy or to their union allies ... It deprioritizes the video game and sacrifices the video game player in order to allow for tackle football or rugby to be played more safely ... It is the equivalent of asking a football player to either quit playing video games during the season or choose between sports esports or being a football player
Personally my opinion would be that I think that ultimately / eventually this logic will follow suit in Florida just based on the fact that in California there is laws to protect "esports athletes" and then Florida is going to want to convert "esports athletes" into "rugby players" ... I know it`s a "football" reference to use terminology from the { confederacy (vs) union } debate, I just want to share what I think could become a { Florida (vs) California } topic in the long run or in the future. And, I`m conflating the terms of football and rugby, which could be a confusing difference between { Australian, American, European } language versions of sporting terms. I don`t know for whom this might be a serious point of concern as it might regard Capture mode in JJ2. I`m not personally signed up for any political debates (at present), however I would like to share my perspective on the 'mentality' that might become an important topic to be aware of, since I`d prefer NOT to allow modern-day ignorance to eventually, potentially inevitably, lead to next-season`s confusions, when arguments over "why this player or that player should or shouldn`t be allowed to play or to participate" are bound to happen :;, that`s why I`m topic posting about this topic.
[u][b]«[/b] ? should esports be illegal in the confederacy ¿ [b]»[/b][/u]
[b]=->[/b] note that while one mainstream view would equate "esports" with a "video game tournament" contrarily another point of view (confederate)
would argue that a football player cannot participate in esports without getting cut from the team since in the confederacy,
all "multi-sport athletes" require explicit approval from the athletic director and have to arrange their schedule so that any "video game tournaments"
wouldn`t conflict with any SEC bowl games (this reference roughly translates to a counter-cultural term for a football game and/or rugby tournament , etc.)
[b]-[/b] Although this argument could seem like:
[b]...[/b] It only applies to floridians or participants or players of rugby or tackle football players in the confederacy or to their union allies
[b]...[/b] It deprioritizes the video game and sacrifices the video game player in order to allow for tackle football or rugby to be played more safely
[b]...[/b] It is the equivalent of asking a football player to either quit playing video games during the season or choose between sports esports or being a football player
[i]Personally my opinion[/i] would be that [i]I think[/i] that ultimately / eventually this logic will follow suit in Florida just based on the fact that in California there is laws to protect "esports athletes" and then Florida is going to want to convert "esports athletes" into "rugby players" ... I [i]know[/i] it`s a "football" reference to use terminology from the { confederacy (vs) union } debate, [i]I just want to share what I think[/i] could become a { Florida (vs) California } topic in the long run or in the future. [i]And, I`m[/i] conflating the terms of football and rugby, which could be a confusing difference between { Australian, American, European } language versions of sporting terms. [i] I don`t know [/i] for whom this might be a serious point of concern as it might regard Capture mode in JJ2. [i]I`m not personally[/i] signed up for any political debates (at present), however [i]I would like to share my perspective[/i] on the 'mentality' that might become an important topic to be aware of, since [i]I`d prefer[/i] NOT to allow modern-day ignorance to eventually, potentially inevitably, lead to next-season`s confusions, when arguments over "why this player or that player should or shouldn`t be allowed to play or to participate" are bound to happen :;, [i]that`s why I`m topic posting about this topic.[/i]
